Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • jevon 1:28 am on December 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply  

    Titanic Collapse of Celebrity 

    We are in an age of mega celebrity. It is everywhere, records are being broken regularly, and the intensity required to be a “fan” feels like it is increasing all the time.

    We are seeing an incredible growth of celebrity but we are also seeing the end of an era in many ways. The next 5 years is the Red Giant of its lifetime: Bigger, more colourful and harder to ignore than ever, but ultimately at the end of its life.

    There could be no more real example than that of Psy. Gangnam Style is catchy, a bit weird and massively popular. Even with over a billion total views, Psy isn’t getting paid:

    Psy’s 900 million video views and 1.3 billion youtube account visits have resulted in $870,000 worth of ad revenue sharing. From the 2.7 million iTunes downloads Psy has earned $2.4 million. His streaming revenues are relatively paltry, a mere $60,000.

    There will be more Psy’s, but then there will be none.

     
  • jevon 11:03 am on October 31, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Building a Shared Web 

    Joyent is both a customer of GoInstant and GoInstant is a customer of Joyent’s. I’ll avoid all the back patting, but we picked Joyent because we needed rock solid infrastructure and AWS wasn’t cutting it for the sort of compute/serving we do. We’ve been extremely happy there.

    So when the folks at Joyent asked if we were interested in contributing a guest post on their blog, we jumped at the chance.

    We also took it as an opportunity to start a conversation about the Shared Web.

    You can read the entire post over on the Joyent Blog: GoInstant and The Dawn of the Completely Shared Web.

    The web is always evolving. As the underlying technology of the web has advanced, we have been able to use the Internet in more creative and interesting ways. We have gone from documents filled with static content to a web of applications, each providing different types of experiences, data and information. We have gone from static shopping cart structures to useful collaborative filtering shopping suggestions to social shopping. We have gone from downloading movies and videos to sharing movies and videos with friends.

    In the past year or two, we have entered a new and incredibly exciting phase of the web – The Shared Web.A few years ago, the idea of a 100% shared Internet seemed impossible. The connections were too sluggish and unreliable – in particular on the mobile side. The Web application frameworks did not do very well with situations where extremely low latency was required to keep users happy. But new technology and changes to the core of the Internet are making a lightning fast Shared Web possible.

     

     
  • jevon 11:40 pm on May 21, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    The age of the intimate web 

    I spent most of the evening hanging out on turntable.fm tonight. It makes the music sharing experience incredibly intimate.

    Then I started staring at Facebook. I can’t shake the sense that there is so much presence on the site, it is obvious that people are there, but there is no intimacy. We come to Facebook today to transact in information. We do not share, instead we distribute.

    Intimacy on the web means that we are aware of the presence of others with us at that place and time and that we can benefit from that real-time presence in a unique way.

    Our lives are so slowly becoming digital. The transition is one that takes decades, not years. The thing I hadn’t realized until recently was that I was mistaking the cataloging of my life online for the living of it.

    It’s the leap that World of Warcraft made in gaming and I’m positive that it is coming to the web sometime very soon.

     
    • Dave Hennessy 4:58 am on November 12, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Great post. I had never really considered the difference between “presence” and “intimacy” in relation to the social Web, but thinking about it I see a huge difference between interaction on Turntable.fm and Facebook.

  • jevon 7:24 pm on February 15, 2011 Permalink | Reply  

    Real-time and the three pillars of the web 

    We have arrived a few definitions for the web in the last few years and I believe we are finally getting to a point where there is enough differentiation that we can think practically about the impact of each component of the web as we know it.

    Social Web

    I have spent a lot of my time thinking about the Social Web and what that means for business and the web in general. It would be hard to argue that Social has not arrived — it is clear that it has. While there is still a lot of maturing to do on the enterprise side, consumers are leading the charge in establishing social as a primary component of the web.

    Mobile Web

    The Mobile Web has grown at a stunning pace in the last 5 years and continues to break new ground. Much of the excitement around the Mobile Web has been focused on the iPhone, but there are other trends that are having a real impact. Mobile is driving much of the consumerization of IT and mobile apps for the enterprise continue to be a foothold for more creative uses of the web by enterprise IT.

    Real-time Web

    Until now the concept of the Real-time Web has been relegated to being a euphemism for the rapid delivery of data streams to the end user. “Real-time Search” for example is focused on delivering the same search results more rapidly. Real-time has not as of yet matured to the point where it is widely regarded as a category. In fact, Wikipedia defines the Real-time web as “a set of technologies and practices that enable users to receive information as soon as it is published by its authors, rather than requiring that they or their software check a source periodically for updates.” That day is coming quickly however.

    I would argue that the opportunity and function of the Real-time Web is largely misunderstood today, much as the Social Web was when it first began to emerge.

    The opportunity for the Real-time Web is to create intimacy and awareness. Where the Social Web gave us a wealth of relationships across a great breadth, and the Mobile Web gave us an immediacy of relationship, the Real-time Web will allow us to connect more closely with those we know with a higher fidelity interaction.

    Of course, these are pillars of a single web, and there is a significant amount of overlap between each one, but as we continue to better understand each pillar more clearly in its own right, we are able to see new opportunities that may not have been possible with a singular view of the web.

    The advent of Real-time brings with it some very new and compelling opportunities. For a long time now we have mixed “collaboration” in as a use case for the Social Web, but so much collaboration is actually in real-time. That is why we have meeting rooms and why the phone continues to be so useful. So far the software that enables Real-time collaboration has been limited, bulky and poorly executed. It has all been built as a native application (think Screen Sharing, MS Groove, etc). We are however finally at the stage where we can deliver Real-time on the web at scale.

    As a sort of Friendster of the Real-time web Google Wave was the sacrificial lamb of the Real-time Web. A beautiful and inspiring first experiment in creating a Real-time experience at scale, it was an incredibly intimate and deep experience as a user. The quality of the interaction was evident but the main problem was that we assumed that all of the use-cases of the Social Web applied in Google Wave. There was no framework by which users could determine what problems to apply Wave to and it became too uncertain of a place. “Should I be here?”, “What am I doing here?” — we didn’t know why we were using the Real-time web.

    Perhaps, to be crass, Google Wave’s technology should have been applied to dating. It might have made more sense to an initial audience.

    Unlike Wave however, Quora has begun to integrate more and more of a Real-time experience in to their application. As other people are responding to a question, voting up and answer or completing other tasks, Quora tells you in Real-time what is going on and who you are interacting with. It is a very engaging experience and creates a new sense of life within the application. It is a subtle but important use of Real-time.

    Moving forward

    The Real-time Web has a long way to go but I suspect that the rate of its growth will be rapid. As Mobile and Social experiences have become incredibly pervasive in the last 5 years, Real-time will leverage that critical mass to catch up very quickly.

    In the enterprise
    Enterprise process is dominated by finite tasks. As social software has been making inroads in to the enterprise we have seen an attempt to utilize socialization of process and software as a way of adding value to those process. The problem however is that they are fundamentally tasks which need to be completed directly.

    The Social Web provides an overarching context (“who should be completing the task”) but it does not provide a better way of actually completing that task and moving on to the next one. A combination of Social and Real-time technologies give us an opportunity to leverage what we have developed with social software inside the enterprise.

    Real-time collaboration on the web inside the enterprise is currently limited and it is not pervasive. It is limited to single applications (such as Webex, Gotomeeting, etc) which are catch-all solutions based on arcane technology. Future Real-time applications inside the enterprise will be more pervasive and integrated with existing Social and Mobile efforts.

    Gaming
    Gaming is the one place where the Real-time Web has had a foothold for a long time. Social and Mobile are only really coming to gaming now, but MMPOGs have been around for over a decade and multi-player gaming continues to be very popular.

    Consumer Web
    Facebook already has Facebook Chat, but I think you will see them take a page from Quora’s book and more tightly integrate the real-time experience. Rather than having new Wall Posts streamed to you when they are complete, you will see “John M. is currently typing . . .” when you visit a wall and it will give you a better sense of the existence of other users as part of an ecosystem, rather than as simple content-producers.

    There are natural limitations to the application of Real-time Shared Web Experiences, but there are many.

    More

    The applications are endless, but they are also vertical. Where social can be effectively applied to broad problem sets, Real-time is necessarily narrow but deep. There will be no “Real-time for busineses [linked-in]” or for Dating, but instead there will be applications of Real-time within those and other domains in order to accomplish outcomes that were not previously possible.

    So I have to ask Euan, Rob, JP, Susan, Andrew, Ross, Jeremiah, Ray, Dennis and others who have all been instrumental in definining the Social Web for me: What does the Real-time Web mean to you?

     
    • Euan 4:03 am on February 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      I am not sure I agree that social tools only give context rather than helping carry out tasks. Work for many people is “knowledge work” for want of a better phrase and “doing” things mostly involves thinking and writing and social tools can help both of those activities.

      I always struggled with the blur or IRC and even find the real time aspects of Quora hard to cope with. I reckon we’re going to end up with an ecology of tools that we dip in and out of for different purposes at different stages of whatever process we are involved in.

    • JP 5:55 am on February 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Real-time is a loaded term. Is TV in the USA real-time after Janet Jackson? If you don’t trade stocks, is a 15 minute delay in stock prices significant to you? Does a real-time general ledger make sense?

      Waiting faster is not necessarily valuable. To me real-time is like simplicity. Keep everything as simple as possible. And no simpler. Keep everything as real-time as necessary. And not an iota more.

    • Tonia Ries 11:42 am on February 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Interesting post, Jevon, and a lot of good food for thought. I think you really hit on it when you talk about the realtime web in the context of collaboration. We’re seeing the beginning of a very powerful new way for communities to self-organize around a specific, time-based opportunity. The potential applications and their impact on existing social, business and community structures are enormous.

    • vanderwal 2:16 pm on February 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      One of the hurdles for real-time in organizations is it often requires going to a 3rd place (e-mail and regular work interface/tool are 1st two interfaces) to see and participate. Many social tools face this hurdle it requires a new pattern and developing a new habit and additional effort. This problem gets compounded when it is real-time as time matters (approvals, review, sanity checks, feedback while a person is asking a question in a meeting, etc.) have short relevance windows.

      The other need with real-time is filtering, particularly when used in an active mature social environment with high volume and velocity of information flows. Few services deal with this well even when immediacy is not as relevant.

      All of this is based on many assumptions around needs being met, understanding what in organizations requires real-time, embracing the many synchronous platforms that currently exist in organizations (MS Communicator, IM/Chat, phone, virtual meeting, live forum services, internal SMS services, etc.).

    • vanderwal 2:26 pm on February 16, 2011 Permalink | Reply

      Ah, the other essential piece that many real-time and near real-time services miss it the need for storing/archiving, searching, aggregating, and integrating the information in these services into the next stages (lessons learned documents, process / product changes, white papers, reviews, etc.) of information flows. Many services replicate the Facebook problem of anything said more than a week ago becomes painful to resurface, let alone reuse, or hold onto.

      The last thing organizations want is embracing the forgetful hallways of the physical world where the great ideas and inspirations are exchanged, but lost by the time people get to their desks. As an employee of Sun said at a conference, “We became a much smarter company when became more virtual and our hallway conversations were remembered so they were usable, sharable, and reusable.”

    • Josh 2:04 am on January 9, 2012 Permalink | Reply

      These three pillars constitute a Web 2.5 at best.

      Another pillar or set of pillars are the semantic web and machine learning, with all the automation made possible with them.

  • jevon 2:28 pm on November 11, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    E20 vs Social Business? 

    I thought I would make a helpful slide for the next time an “Enterprise 2.0″ vs “Social Business” debate comes up.

    Feel free to click to get the full sized detailed view. I made it as pretty as I could.

    E20 and Social Business each both need the other. The more that IT can focus on becoming more comptent in rapidly testing, deploying and monitoring E20 applications in the enterprise, the faster and more effectively Social Business will be a reality.

     
  • jevon 10:46 am on October 15, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Enterprise Startups survey 

    I have created a short questionnaire that I am sending out to people who have built or are building enterprise focused software startups. This is not a formal survey, and I am not doing it for commercial purposes. What I want to do is collect the insights, advice and experience of people who have been-there-done-that, or who are in the thick of it right now.

    Please take a look and fill it out if it applies to you

     
  • jevon 6:42 pm on September 26, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , startups   

    Want to make money in enterprise software? Take things that are really complicated now, and make them so simple that people can understand why it makes sense to pay for.

     
    • Danny Robinson 7:37 pm on September 29, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      This is an increasingly hot space. There will be a day that enterprises don’t have any servers and no IT staff. -yes bold statement. It will take a long time, but huge opportunity for startups to take advantage over the next few years.

  • jevon 12:38 am on September 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Perhaps I am getting a bit older and a bit more grumpy. . . 

    but Twitter and Facebook are not resulting in new, or even deeper, relationships for me . . .

    I feel like my social life has become a more mundane version of CNN Headline news. No depth, just pictures and blurbs and the latest rage about something new.

    Don’t you feel just a little ripped off?

     
    • Boris Mann 2:36 am on September 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I believe it’s called Jaded 2.0

      (ducks)

    • Lee Bryant 3:09 am on September 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Not really. I hear what you are saying, but I find Twitter in particular helps gradually widen and refine my wider network of weak ties, which is useful but perhaps not the deeper relationship type you mention above. Blogging is still better for cultivating deeper relationships because of the commitment and time investment required to bot write, read and comment, and I find that relationships based on blogging have much greater longevity and I tend to feel closer to those people than, say, Twitter followers.

      But really there is no substitute for lunch ;-)

    • Stuart Barr 5:10 am on September 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I kind of agree with both of you. I don’t really make any new or deeper relationships via twitter or facebook, I already know most people I follow. It does help me keep loosely in touch with people that I would probably otherwise lose contact with though. But I find twitter generally too noisy, with too much inane “information”. RSS / Blogs are still where I get most of my quality information and knowledge but I engage less with blogs generally than with people on twitter.

      +1 for lunch ;-)

    • Rob Paterson 8:09 am on September 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      I keep my FB gang tight – no people who I don’t know – my only exception is that I have expanded my PEI group so that I know more about where I live – same for Twitter and I use lists to go deeper into place or issue

      But Blogging is still best – both the writer and reader have to make more effort and as Lee says

      The Rage? A huge problem that is ripping the polity apart – I had hoped that the web would bring us closer but I fear that it is making us more emotional and tribal

      Lunch is best

    • Saqib Ali 6:36 pm on September 10, 2010 Permalink | Reply

      Jevon,

      I harvested contents from this blogpost into a comment on one of the gartner blogs:
      http://blogs.gartner.com/carol_rozwell/2010/09/10/employees-social-media-and-chocolate-mousse/

      (hopefully you don’t mind me harvesting……)

  • jevon 7:53 pm on July 27, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    I will be posting on startupnorth.ca for the next little while. More here later.

     
  • jevon 9:45 am on May 14, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    I am done whining about mobile service 

    I have to say, for all the moaning and complaining that we do here in Canada about our abnormally high cell data/voice rates (and the complaints about our lack of any sort of “unlimited” option), I can’t imagine what most Canadians would think if we had to live on a network as bad as AT&T or T-Mobile. The networks in Canada are rock solid and the idea that a provider might claim to work in a certain area, but then have things like call drops and poor throughput is unheard of here. You either have coverage or you don’t. When you do have coverage it is solid. There are always exceptions of course, but as a general rule a provider will never say “yes, we service your city” if their coverage in that area is not excellent.

    At this point, and after having spent much of the last year in the US experiencing AT&Ts service, I am happy to pay ~10$ or ~20$ more a month to get rock solid service, whether it is from Bell, Telus or Rogers. (New entrants left out for obvious reasons) The hyper-competitive environment in the US seems to have led to a lower overall QoS. Perhaps that is what the market wants and demands there, but I am happy to have some choice here.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.