<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The death of Resolution: Immediacy is the new Quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/</link>
	<description>The people woven web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:48:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The FASTForward Blog &#187; The uncertain future of Blogging: Enterprise 2.0 Blog: News, Coverage, and Commentary</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-28852</link>
		<dc:creator>The FASTForward Blog &#187; The uncertain future of Blogging: Enterprise 2.0 Blog: News, Coverage, and Commentary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-28852</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Luddites Are bloggers the new Luddites? Those who expect too much value in a single piece of content may have an expectation that is out of date. Much like newsroom editors arguing over the production values of a piece while another station has people sending in grainy pictures from their cellphones, bloggers may simple be caught in the middle of a shift away from production values to immediacy. I believe this has been illustrated throughout history and I examined this phenomenon earlier this year in my post &#8220;The Death of Resolution: Immediacy is the new quality&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Luddites Are bloggers the new Luddites? Those who expect too much value in a single piece of content may have an expectation that is out of date. Much like newsroom editors arguing over the production values of a piece while another station has people sending in grainy pictures from their cellphones, bloggers may simple be caught in the middle of a shift away from production values to immediacy. I believe this has been illustrated throughout history and I examined this phenomenon earlier this year in my post &#8220;The Death of Resolution: Immediacy is the new quality&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Kass</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-24765</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Kass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-24765</guid>
		<description>Think of your product and segments as well.  Watching a video isn&#039;t exactly a &quot;high involvement&quot; decision and what need is satisified?  Entertainment.  Not ot mention that college students are not exactly known for their patience and their desire for the finer things in life.  Quality still matters to some, but yes, speed is started to kill more and more often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of your product and segments as well.  Watching a video isn&#8217;t exactly a &#8220;high involvement&#8221; decision and what need is satisified?  Entertainment.  Not ot mention that college students are not exactly known for their patience and their desire for the finer things in life.  Quality still matters to some, but yes, speed is started to kill more and more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Eby</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-18128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Eby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-18128</guid>
		<description>Jevon:

Great post.  The one piece to watch will be whether the pipeline will grow fast enough to support the increase in content, particularly video, that will travel through the web.  There&#039;s already some of the major broadband providers seeking to change their pricing structure to charge heavy bandwidth users more than light users of the web.  This could cause a major digital divide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jevon:</p>
<p>Great post.  The one piece to watch will be whether the pipeline will grow fast enough to support the increase in content, particularly video, that will travel through the web.  There&#8217;s already some of the major broadband providers seeking to change their pricing structure to charge heavy bandwidth users more than light users of the web.  This could cause a major digital divide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Pate</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-17925</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Pate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-17925</guid>
		<description>Bam! You even nailed the laser discs part of the story, well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bam! You even nailed the laser discs part of the story, well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-17844</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-17844</guid>
		<description>Jev, great post. Very interesting analysis â€“ my response below:

I donâ€™t believe immediacy will trump quality. Just as Zara has not put Gucci out of business, and McDonaldâ€™s poses no threat to Colborne Lane, so too will YouTube and other streaming platforms fail to kill cinema. This is a discussion of platform, content, and individual desire.

The traditional moviegoing experience wonâ€™t be obsolesced by streaming videos and small-screen digital platforms. The change afoot is that moviegoing will be &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt; way of seeing a new film rather than &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; way. I see content delivery formats and modes as existing on a continuum, and as we move down the continuum, popularity is evenly spaced. For example â€“ in music, while the mp3 is incredibly popular, and downloads surge while CD sales slump, the LP is simultaneously undergoing a niche renaissance â€“ some might even argue it never disappeared at all, but held on to a steady niche appeal with a particular group of consumers. 

I believe a surge in convenience retrieves the inconvenient, a surge in the â€˜virtualâ€™ retrieves the physical â€“ as a niche pattern. I donâ€™t believe that â€œsnack-sizedâ€ media will replace epic visual feasts of film and story, I believe there is room for both, and each will find its place with the consumers who most value their particular advantages. 

As the audiophile niche has rediscovered the sonic â€œwarmthâ€ of the LP, so too will cineasts insist upon the â€œwarmthâ€ and authenticity of the traditional theatrical experience, viewing full-length features on projected film, from start to finish. However, what we understand to be a â€˜traditionalâ€™ moviegoing experience will be but one platform for the consumption of a film. It will be a niche experience and no longer the primary option, or even the most popular option, for visual media. But it will not die.

There will instead be a range of options represented in format and delivery platform, and there will be &lt;i&gt;winners&lt;/i&gt;, plural, for each combination of format and delivery that represent the range of goals in user experience. Convenience, for some consumers, will never trump immersion or escape. I believe this idea holds true when discussing nearly every content delivery medium I can think of (from books to blogs and back again.)

Iâ€™m sure youâ€™ve heard a new theatrical release reviewed dismissively as a â€œrentalâ€? This is the behavioral and preferential range Iâ€™m talking about. Whatâ€™s great is that this is about individual taste and the &lt;i&gt;fitness&lt;/i&gt; of any medium or platform to the tastes and desires of the individual consumer. Iâ€™ll invoke the almighty McLuhan tetrad here, to remind you that any new format or medium may obsolesce another, but it will retrieve still another, and as long as we individuals continue to have a plurality of priorities and desires â€“ desires that vary situationally according to the complex interplay of both contextual and subjective motivational factors as well as our perception of the content itself, then that plurality of goals and desires from person to person (and within one person from situation to situation) will be represented in the range of â€œwinningâ€ media and platforms we popularize. 

My two. Keep up the great posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jev, great post. Very interesting analysis â€“ my response below:</p>
<p>I donâ€™t believe immediacy will trump quality. Just as Zara has not put Gucci out of business, and McDonaldâ€™s poses no threat to Colborne Lane, so too will YouTube and other streaming platforms fail to kill cinema. This is a discussion of platform, content, and individual desire.</p>
<p>The traditional moviegoing experience wonâ€™t be obsolesced by streaming videos and small-screen digital platforms. The change afoot is that moviegoing will be <i>one</i> way of seeing a new film rather than <i>the</i> way. I see content delivery formats and modes as existing on a continuum, and as we move down the continuum, popularity is evenly spaced. For example â€“ in music, while the mp3 is incredibly popular, and downloads surge while CD sales slump, the LP is simultaneously undergoing a niche renaissance â€“ some might even argue it never disappeared at all, but held on to a steady niche appeal with a particular group of consumers. </p>
<p>I believe a surge in convenience retrieves the inconvenient, a surge in the â€˜virtualâ€™ retrieves the physical â€“ as a niche pattern. I donâ€™t believe that â€œsnack-sizedâ€ media will replace epic visual feasts of film and story, I believe there is room for both, and each will find its place with the consumers who most value their particular advantages. </p>
<p>As the audiophile niche has rediscovered the sonic â€œwarmthâ€ of the LP, so too will cineasts insist upon the â€œwarmthâ€ and authenticity of the traditional theatrical experience, viewing full-length features on projected film, from start to finish. However, what we understand to be a â€˜traditionalâ€™ moviegoing experience will be but one platform for the consumption of a film. It will be a niche experience and no longer the primary option, or even the most popular option, for visual media. But it will not die.</p>
<p>There will instead be a range of options represented in format and delivery platform, and there will be <i>winners</i>, plural, for each combination of format and delivery that represent the range of goals in user experience. Convenience, for some consumers, will never trump immersion or escape. I believe this idea holds true when discussing nearly every content delivery medium I can think of (from books to blogs and back again.)</p>
<p>Iâ€™m sure youâ€™ve heard a new theatrical release reviewed dismissively as a â€œrentalâ€? This is the behavioral and preferential range Iâ€™m talking about. Whatâ€™s great is that this is about individual taste and the <i>fitness</i> of any medium or platform to the tastes and desires of the individual consumer. Iâ€™ll invoke the almighty McLuhan tetrad here, to remind you that any new format or medium may obsolesce another, but it will retrieve still another, and as long as we individuals continue to have a plurality of priorities and desires â€“ desires that vary situationally according to the complex interplay of both contextual and subjective motivational factors as well as our perception of the content itself, then that plurality of goals and desires from person to person (and within one person from situation to situation) will be represented in the range of â€œwinningâ€ media and platforms we popularize. </p>
<p>My two. Keep up the great posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jevon</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-17812</link>
		<dc:creator>Jevon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-17812</guid>
		<description>We will have both, and it will be pretty soon, but it actually probably won&#039;t be because of better broadband tech being rolled out. Despite cool projects like Verizon FIOS and what Comcast might be doing, broadband in north america has stagnated really seriously in the last several years. 

About 50% of US households have &quot;broadband&quot; and the job of rebuilding that entire network for 10x speed is going to take a long time. 

Also, the typical streaming-video audience that I talked about are more likely to be on university broadband connections, which are generally extremely fast.

But the bigger problem I see is that a) HDDVD/Blu-Ray quality (ie: HD) and even DVD-equivalent is still a ways off from being streamed on-demand and the second I click on the play button (or even within 5-10 minutes). Try downloading an HD film on Apple TV, it takes a while. Tech technology is still not there in Flash or Silverlight either.

The habits that will form in the meantime are what I meant to point out as the biggest real change, and simply providing content the way it is produced now isn&#039;t going to cut it, expectations will probably be changed by the time the two technologies (broadband and video formats) converge.

That is.... I think. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will have both, and it will be pretty soon, but it actually probably won&#8217;t be because of better broadband tech being rolled out. Despite cool projects like Verizon FIOS and what Comcast might be doing, broadband in north america has stagnated really seriously in the last several years. </p>
<p>About 50% of US households have &#8220;broadband&#8221; and the job of rebuilding that entire network for 10x speed is going to take a long time. </p>
<p>Also, the typical streaming-video audience that I talked about are more likely to be on university broadband connections, which are generally extremely fast.</p>
<p>But the bigger problem I see is that a) HDDVD/Blu-Ray quality (ie: HD) and even DVD-equivalent is still a ways off from being streamed on-demand and the second I click on the play button (or even within 5-10 minutes). Try downloading an HD film on Apple TV, it takes a while. Tech technology is still not there in Flash or Silverlight either.</p>
<p>The habits that will form in the meantime are what I meant to point out as the biggest real change, and simply providing content the way it is produced now isn&#8217;t going to cut it, expectations will probably be changed by the time the two technologies (broadband and video formats) converge.</p>
<p>That is&#8230;. I think. <img src='http://socialwrite.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Scrupski</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-17811</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Scrupski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 03:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-17811</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you think we&#039;ll have both and soon?  Immediacy and quality?  I don&#039;t know enough about the technologies, but as bandwidth is growing at unprecedented speeds and the technologies are just getting easier for developers...  For instance, I had lunch today with a gaming exec who told me Comcast is getting ready to roll out 10x faster broadband access in its markets.  Innovation in the media &amp; entertainment side of the business is closely aligned to advertising too -- where the dollar incentive is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think we&#8217;ll have both and soon?  Immediacy and quality?  I don&#8217;t know enough about the technologies, but as bandwidth is growing at unprecedented speeds and the technologies are just getting easier for developers&#8230;  For instance, I had lunch today with a gaming exec who told me Comcast is getting ready to roll out 10x faster broadband access in its markets.  Innovation in the media &amp; entertainment side of the business is closely aligned to advertising too &#8212; where the dollar incentive is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Paterson</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-17790</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Paterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/2008/02/06/the-death-of-resolution-immediacy-is-the-new-quality/#comment-17790</guid>
		<description>The best post I have ever seen you do J - brilliant!
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best post I have ever seen you do J &#8211; brilliant!<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
