<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The end of aggregation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/</link>
	<description>The people woven web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:48:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank heaven, 11 fresh content strategy links &#171; new media mentality</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-33587</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank heaven, 11 fresh content strategy links &#171; new media mentality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/?p=482#comment-33587</guid>
		<description>[...] The end of aggregation? by Jevon MacDonald [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The end of aggregation? by Jevon MacDonald [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Karrer</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-33523</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Karrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/?p=482#comment-33523</guid>
		<description>Late to the game on this one, but I&#039;m not quite sure I get this.  Isn&#039;t it all of the above?  All of this is content and signals and the winners will be those who can make sense of it.  See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.browsemystuff.com/wpblog/social-filtering/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Social Filtering&lt;/a&gt; for some thoughts on how curation at a couple of levels and social signals combine to form a more interesting stream.  Of course, that&#039;s in one domain at a time.  Much more challenging when you try to define &quot;interesting&quot; across everything.  Still, it&#039;s all of the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the game on this one, but I&#8217;m not quite sure I get this.  Isn&#8217;t it all of the above?  All of this is content and signals and the winners will be those who can make sense of it.  See: <a href="http://www.browsemystuff.com/wpblog/social-filtering/" rel="nofollow">Social Filtering</a> for some thoughts on how curation at a couple of levels and social signals combine to form a more interesting stream.  Of course, that&#8217;s in one domain at a time.  Much more challenging when you try to define &#8220;interesting&#8221; across everything.  Still, it&#8217;s all of the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Bohmbach</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-33490</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Bohmbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/?p=482#comment-33490</guid>
		<description>Aggregation will turn into curation. People will put these things together. 

And to be a stickler regarding something you said, streams are NOT walled gardens. Twitter has open API&#039;s. You can put anything on top of it to make it something different. Twitter feeds can come into any environment, I&#039;d argue nobody has done a good job of it yet.

Facebook, MySpace, sites that require you to log in and oh-by the way-keep your information and have a right to use it because of how they worded the term and conditions-those are walled gardens. 

I don&#039;t like it when people mix these two together, they are VERY different. It&#039;s an important distinction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aggregation will turn into curation. People will put these things together. </p>
<p>And to be a stickler regarding something you said, streams are NOT walled gardens. Twitter has open API&#8217;s. You can put anything on top of it to make it something different. Twitter feeds can come into any environment, I&#8217;d argue nobody has done a good job of it yet.</p>
<p>Facebook, MySpace, sites that require you to log in and oh-by the way-keep your information and have a right to use it because of how they worded the term and conditions-those are walled gardens. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like it when people mix these two together, they are VERY different. It&#8217;s an important distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Paterson</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-33453</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Paterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/?p=482#comment-33453</guid>
		<description>Hi J
I am with Jason - I have been seeing in practice the emergence of the Human &quot;Editor/aggregator/curator who uses the aggregator tools to offer them a pool to fish in.

I suspect that in a world of infinite content the human and the personal selection in fields will be where the value will be found - for instance think of say the Classical Music Mavens that exist  - not only can they add value by talking about Beethoven but can also help us navigate through 500 recordings of the 5th. Think of any topic and there will be a few people at the centre who know so much - who can form the &quot;sun&quot; that holds the system together</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi J<br />
I am with Jason &#8211; I have been seeing in practice the emergence of the Human &#8220;Editor/aggregator/curator who uses the aggregator tools to offer them a pool to fish in.</p>
<p>I suspect that in a world of infinite content the human and the personal selection in fields will be where the value will be found &#8211; for instance think of say the Classical Music Mavens that exist  &#8211; not only can they add value by talking about Beethoven but can also help us navigate through 500 recordings of the 5th. Think of any topic and there will be a few people at the centre who know so much &#8211; who can form the &#8220;sun&#8221; that holds the system together</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Keath</title>
		<link>http://socialwrite.com/2009/08/25/the-end-of-aggregation/comment-page-1/#comment-33432</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Keath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://socialwrite.com/?p=482#comment-33432</guid>
		<description>The future of aggregation (or the death of) for me is people powered. Instead of sorting info feeds, I sort people feeds. I do this already in Google reader. And of course Twitter and Facebook embody the idea wholly. Smart people who deliver good info on certain subjects, certain niches, are becoming invaluable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The future of aggregation (or the death of) for me is people powered. Instead of sorting info feeds, I sort people feeds. I do this already in Google reader. And of course Twitter and Facebook embody the idea wholly. Smart people who deliver good info on certain subjects, certain niches, are becoming invaluable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
